-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Library
Downloads
Gallery
Posts posted by Rupesh Parbhoo
-
-
Hello Baishun,
You are correct. When using the Histogram Tool with the aggregation type "time," the timezone of UTC is used.One way to ensure the aggregation time fits your time zone is to create a new condition with your appropriate time zone from Tools > Identify > Periodic Condition.
Using this new condition, change the aggregation type in your histogram to Condition (instead of time).
Let me know if this works for you.
Best Regards,
Rupesh- 1
-
Thanks Tyler,
Can you check one more thing. I think you mentioned it above, that the time range for the organizer topic and workbench are different. I am assuming you will see that phantom capsule when you update your current workbench to near now (currently its at the end of March).The way to get rid of this uncertain condition is you can take your current condition ($condition) and apply the inside(past()) function to it. This should remove that last uncertain capsule.
$condition.inside(past())
-
Hi Tyler,
I needed some clarification on your request. If the capsule is in progress, do you prefer that it doesn't show up at all or that it shows up as a normal capsule. The issue you are dealing with is called uncertainty. Uncertain data can’t be cached, so these regions of uncertainty require the computation to be repeated, showing that open bar. There are various causes of uncertainty in a condition or signal. Are you able to share the formula for the blowdown event condition? -
Hello Bao,
When upgrading to r60+ you will need to use spy.upgrade() instead of the pip install seeq commands. Please let me know if this works for you.
spy.upgrade()
Regards,
Rupesh- 1
Comparing start and end values during an event
in General Seeq Discussions
Posted
In order to compare the actual value of the signal before and after some event, you must first identify the event.
Method 1: Running Delta. Note: an approach using the running delta function can be preferred to the derivative function (Method 2) when step changes are present as the derivative is infinite during these steps. Using the derivative function works best if the signal is first cleansed/filtered and the interpolation method changed to linear.
Method 2: Derivative. Best approach for most rate of change problems, excluding step changes.