One of my calculations in Seeq requires me to use SCALAR.INVALID.toSignal() and a long chain of splice() formula. For example:
SCALAR.INVALID.toSignal()
.splice(22.32.toSignal(),$a)
.splice(23.23.toSignal(),$b)
.splice(24.54.toSignal(),$c)
.splice(25.72.toSignal(),$d)
.splice(26.02.toSignal(),$e)
.splice(27.11.toSignal(),$f)
.splice(28.54.toSignal(),$g)
.splice(29.79.toSignal(),$h)
.splice(30.95.toSignal(),$i)
.splice(31.45.toSignal(),$j)
.splice(32.72.toSignal(),$k)
.splice(33.97.toSignal(),$l)
.splice(34.76.toSignal(),$m)
However, the calculation is not able to complete loading. Is there an alternative to replace SCALAR.INVALID? Any suggestions on how to improve this calculation?
Alternative to SCALAR.INVALID
in General Seeq Discussions
Posted
Hi Seeq,
One of my calculations in Seeq requires me to use SCALAR.INVALID.toSignal() and a long chain of splice() formula. For example:
SCALAR.INVALID.toSignal()
.splice(22.32.toSignal(),$a)
.splice(23.23.toSignal(),$b)
.splice(24.54.toSignal(),$c)
.splice(25.72.toSignal(),$d)
.splice(26.02.toSignal(),$e)
.splice(27.11.toSignal(),$f)
.splice(28.54.toSignal(),$g)
.splice(29.79.toSignal(),$h)
.splice(30.95.toSignal(),$i)
.splice(31.45.toSignal(),$j)
.splice(32.72.toSignal(),$k)
.splice(33.97.toSignal(),$l)
.splice(34.76.toSignal(),$m)
However, the calculation is not able to complete loading. Is there an alternative to replace SCALAR.INVALID? Any suggestions on how to improve this calculation?